I think you're missing the real point of why we're asking for some activity. We're not asking for you to provide us either full AC or half AC. Just any type of activity at all, even if it's just a few comments in a thread. Under any other normal circumstances, we would not be asking this of you. This is clear through the fact we're not asking for activity for either Peter or Marius. Instead we're focusing on Yamamoto and Crane because they are a particular case. That is because you've been, for the most part, inconsistently passing the AC's with those two.
You did pass with both in May, but in Yamamoto's in case it was because he had a strike in April. He also had a strike in February. Already we're having the pattern of Strike --> Pass --> Strike --> Pass. Thus the only reason why you did pass in May was because you had the strike in April.
For Crane, we noticed that most of his threads are coming in during the last few days of the check and thus only barely passing. This occurred in May, April, and it wasn't so much in March, but it occurred during that as well.
I did not look at Peter and Marius and I am assuming that the pattern is not as heavy because they've always been cleared (with Marius also being newer so there's less to go by). But even if it so, we are getting the sense that you focus more on them and will almost certainly pass AC with those characters.
Yamamoto and Crane, however, are less certain and they having strikes while the other two passed in June are clear evidence of that. Peter and Marius all had links that started early in June. Crane's only "proof" back then was very last minute, and the same is true for Yamamoto. To be honest, we shouldn't have accepted them.
To end, and to once again emphasize, this is less about a generic rule and more on point of us addressing poor activity in relation to these specific characters. Yamamoto at the very least has seen the worst of it and we are questioning Crane's. It may look like he's passing, but the dates tell us a different picture. We'd also like to note that you yourself placed the responsibility on tagging others, regardless of where you were. And we also noticed that upon your return, you only tagged with Peter and Marius.
We understand that players will have preferences on who to play with, especially on their return. We're not faulting you on that. We are just most concerned about the other two, particularly since they have the strike and more so due to the trend we have been seeing. That is why the bar on those two characters is much higher.
no subject
You did pass with both in May, but in Yamamoto's in case it was because he had a strike in April. He also had a strike in February. Already we're having the pattern of Strike --> Pass --> Strike --> Pass. Thus the only reason why you did pass in May was because you had the strike in April.
For Crane, we noticed that most of his threads are coming in during the last few days of the check and thus only barely passing. This occurred in May, April, and it wasn't so much in March, but it occurred during that as well.
I did not look at Peter and Marius and I am assuming that the pattern is not as heavy because they've always been cleared (with Marius also being newer so there's less to go by). But even if it so, we are getting the sense that you focus more on them and will almost certainly pass AC with those characters.
Yamamoto and Crane, however, are less certain and they having strikes while the other two passed in June are clear evidence of that. Peter and Marius all had links that started early in June. Crane's only "proof" back then was very last minute, and the same is true for Yamamoto. To be honest, we shouldn't have accepted them.
To end, and to once again emphasize, this is less about a generic rule and more on point of us addressing poor activity in relation to these specific characters. Yamamoto at the very least has seen the worst of it and we are questioning Crane's. It may look like he's passing, but the dates tell us a different picture. We'd also like to note that you yourself placed the responsibility on tagging others, regardless of where you were. And we also noticed that upon your return, you only tagged with Peter and Marius.
We understand that players will have preferences on who to play with, especially on their return. We're not faulting you on that. We are just most concerned about the other two, particularly since they have the strike and more so due to the trend we have been seeing. That is why the bar on those two characters is much higher.